Mucho, mucho más que expresión corporal: Sobre arte-terapia y el arte de la danza

Por Cintia Katiana Ugarte Checa y Juan Pablo Torres Muñiz

Otra vez, nada nuevo: bajo el pretexto de accesibilidad y bienestar, se transforman prácticas artísticas en meros instrumentos de complacencia afectiva y control social, diluyendo su potencial para expandir el conocimiento humano y, ni qué decir, para desafiar límites ontológicos. Así, ante la proliferación masiva de enfoques que reducen el arte a una forma expresiva catártica, alineada con demandas comerciales en un mercado pletórico, se impone —antipático, dicen— un análisis hondo que distinga sus beneficios terapéuticos —como la liberación emocional y la mejora de la resiliencia en contextos clínicos— de sus consecuencias negativas: el empobrecimiento de la calidad artística, la erosión de la crítica seria y la promoción de la adolescentización masiva. Esto se evidencia con énfasis en las artes plásticas y escénicas, donde las obras se convierten en productos de autoayuda, y particularmente en la danza, degradada a simple baile recreativo que pierde su elocuencia como lenguaje corpóreo interpelador. Para comprender cabalmente esta degradación, es preciso primero examinar el fenómeno general de la arteterapia y, acto seguido, establecer una distinción fundamental entre baile y danza que permita apreciar lo que está en juego.

[Arte-terapia]

La difusión masiva de la arte-terapia, que emplea medios expresivos artísticos para fines terapéuticos, ha ganado terreno como herramienta accesible para el manejo de trastornos emocionales, distinguiéndose claramente del arte en su dimensión institucional cuestionadora. En su acepción de ars —técnica expresiva y forma de catarsis—, opera con materiales plásticos, escénicos o corporales no para interpelar dialécticamente la realidad, sino para facilitar la liberación afectiva, la autoexploración y la integración emocional. Esto ofrece bondades palpables en contextos clínicos y educativos: promueve la expresión de emociones reprimidas, mejora relaciones interpersonales y reduce síntomas de ansiedad y depresión en poblaciones diversas —desde adultos con trastornos mentales hasta adolescentes refugiados— al proporcionar canales verbales, así como no verbales para procesar experiencias especialmente difíciles. Revisiones meta-analíticas confirman que la terapia a través de formas de expresión visual, por ejemplo, se asocia con mejoras en al menos un 18% de los resultados de pacientes, incluyendo mayor autoconocimiento, conexión social y regulación emocional. En contextos de cáncer, por poner otro ejemplo, alivia la ansiedad y eleva la calidad de vida al permitir una elaboración narrativa de experiencias dolorosas. Estas ventajas se extienden a entornos escolares, donde intervenciones artísticas mejoran la autoestima, la resolución de problemas y las actitudes hacia la salud mental. Aplicada con rigor profesional, la terapia a través de la expresión artística (como debiera llamarse para no confundirla con el quehacer artístico, que es mucho más que simple técnica) puede complementar tratamientos convencionales sin pretender sustituirlos, siempre que se reconozca su límite: no generar conocimiento nuevo, sino reorganizar experiencias subjetivas para el bienestar individual.

Sin embargo, su expansión masiva acarrea consecuencias negativas profundas para el arte como institución. Al priorizar la catarsis terapéutica sobre el cuestionamiento racional, contribuye a una pauperización general del campo artístico, donde la obra deja de ser un texto elocuente que interpela conceptos para convertirse en un mero vehículo de complacencia afectiva, alineado con demandas comerciales que privilegian lo accesible y reconfortante sobre la complejidad crítica. Así, aunque útil para mitigar sufrimientos puntuales, la terapia expresiva fomenta la destrucción de la crítica seria al diluir las fronteras entre creación artística y ejercicio amateur, reemplazando el rigor dialéctico —que obliga a reexaminar el mundo material en sus géneros corpóreo, sensible y racional— por una validación subjetiva que evita confrontaciones incómodas. Esto empobrece la calidad cultural y adolescentiza a la población al promover una perpetua búsqueda de gratificación emocional inmediata, en detrimento de la madurez intelectual que surge del enfrentamiento con límites conceptuales. Es sabido que la aproximación inteligente a una obra de arte —la aplicación de racionalidad y sensibilidad educada— puede generar fácilmente ansiedad adicional o activar emociones no resueltas. Al insertarse en un mercado que monetiza el bienestar, la arte-terapia facilita un control poblacional sutil, donde el arte se reduce a un producto consumible que pacifica disidencias en lugar de amplificarlas, alineándose con dinámicas turbo capitalistas que convierten la expresión creativa en una industria de autoayuda.

En las artes plásticas, esta tendencia acelera la transformación de prácticas como la pintura o la escultura en herramientas de restauración personal. El énfasis en el proceso expresivo sobre el producto final diluye estándares de calidad y crítica institucional, favoreciendo obras efímeras y sentimentales que se venden como remedios para el estrés moderno, o meras provocaciones, en lugar de como interpelaciones a la realidad. Revisiones críticas destacan cómo, al incorporar materiales reciclados o técnicas simples en contextos terapéuticos, se desvía el foco de la innovación formal —propia del arte que cuestiona categorías— hacia una mera catarsis. Esto, aunque empodera a individuos marginados al permitirles narrar traumas, termina banalizando el medio al priorizar la sanación individual sobre el impacto colectivo, resultando en una proliferación de productos artísticos de baja exigencia que inundan galerías y mercados digitales. Este fenómeno, agravado por enfoques somáticos que ligan el hacer artístico a la conciencia corporal, critica implícitamente la tradición de la crítica seria al equiparar el arte con cualquier acto expresivo, arruinando niveles de excelencia al democratizarlo de forma acrítica.

En las artes escénicas, el giro terapéutico impone una lente catártica que reduce el teatro y la danza a medios de liberación emocional. Así, se convierten en ejercicios de sanación grupal que priorizan la complacencia afectiva sobre el conflicto dialéctico. Esta orientación, aunque beneficiosa para procesar traumas colectivos, genera riesgos como relaciones terapéuticas insatisfactorias o un uso inadecuado del arte que intensifica decepciones emocionales. Se diluyen narrativas complejas en favor de catarsis simplificadas que alinean las producciones con demandas comerciales de entretenimiento terapéutico. Esta pauperización se manifiesta en la destrucción de la crítica seria, donde reseñas y análisis ceden ante valoraciones subjetivas de «bienestar», arruinando la exigencia técnica y conceptual, y facilitando un control social que canaliza energías disidentes hacia la autoexploración inofensiva.

[Baile y danza]

Para entender la especificidad de lo que se pierde en el caso de la danza, es menester establecer primero la distinción entre ésta y el baile. Aunque a menudo se usen como intercambiables, responden a diferencias etimológicas e históricas que revelan concepciones distintas de la práctica corporal. El baile se asocia con una expresión espontánea y recreativa, mientras que la danza implica una estructuración artística, ritual o institucional que interpela la realidad material.

Etimológicamente, baile proviene del latín vulgar ballare (del griego ballizein, «saltar» o «moverse rítmicamente»), denotando una acción impulsiva, lúdica y efímera, orientada al placer inmediato o la interacción social. Por contraste, danza deriva del francés antiguo danse (del germánico dintjan, «movimiento de un lado a otro»), adquiriendo connotaciones de orden y propósito simbólico que trascienden lo recreativo.

Históricamente, esta bifurcación se manifiesta desde la antigüedad. En la prehistoria y el Egipto antiguo, los movimientos rituales prefiguran la danza como comunicación con lo trascendente. En la Grecia clásica, la danza se consagra a la musa Terpsícore, distinguiéndose entre formas populares de baile y la danza teatral o ritual que interpelaba conceptos éticos. Durante la Edad Media, la Iglesia marginalizó ambas, pero la danza resurgió en contextos cortesanos y eclesiásticos (como las danzas macabras), mientras el baile permanecía en ámbitos profanos. En el Renacimiento y Barroco, la distinción se consolida con la codificación del ballet en la corte francesa, enfatizando técnica y narrativa simbólica, frente al baile social como mero entretenimiento. En el siglo XX, teóricos como Rudolf Laban y Laurence Louppe profundizan esta separación, conceptualizando la danza como un lenguaje kinético estructurado que genera significado, diferenciándola del baile improvisado carente de intencionalidad crítica. En suma, el baile es una operación expresiva accesible y catártica; la danza, una institución artística que, desde sus orígenes rituales, emplea el cuerpo para expandir el mundo racional, demandando disciplina técnica e intencionalidad dialéctica.

[El caso de la danza: su naturaleza y valor]

Partiendo de esta distinción, podemos abordar el caso específico de la danza y comprender por qué su reducción a simple baile terapéutico ejemplifica la ruina más aguda del arte como institución, al despojarla de su capacidad para interpelar el cuerpo material en su dimensión racional y social. Lo peor es que, además, esta práctica tiene un nombre específico: danza-terapia, con una confusión grave de términos.

La danza, en su dimensión institucional como arte, opera primordialmente con el material corpóreo. El cuerpo no es solo medio, sino material elocuente que interpela conceptos como identidad, poder y la intersección entre lo individual y lo colectivo, mediante movimientos que encarnan y desafían limitaciones perceptivas y conceptuales. Desde una perspectiva materialista, la danza emerge como una práctica que cierra un campo operativo específico: el de la kinésis intencional. El coreógrafo o intérprete construye un lenguaje no verbal que obliga al receptor a rearticular sus definiciones de espacio, tiempo y agencia, mediante la manipulación directa de la corporeidad como sustancia viva y relacional. Esto la posiciona como un arte dialéctico, capaz de tematizar la tensión entre control racional e impulso sensible, cuestionando dualismos y proponiendo una integración material donde el movimiento genera conocimiento nuevo al exponer contradicciones de la realidad social y ontológica. En ningún caso la danza es reductible a mera expresión afectiva. En coreografías que demandan precisión técnica y conceptual, el cuerpo realiza conexiones que expanden el mundo operativo del espectador, obligándolo a identificar fallas en conceptos preexistentes sobre autonomía y dependencia. La danza revela el cuerpo como entidad vibrante enredada con el entorno, donde movimientos emergen de interacciones intra-materiales que cuestionan la ilusión de un sujeto autónomo, proponiendo confederaciones de agencia entre cuerpos, espacios y objetos. Esta capacidad interrogativa se ejemplifica en prácticas que incorporan elementos no humanos para generar un discurso kinético que interpela la realidad material en su totalidad, extendiéndose a lo ecológico y político.

Esta operación con el cuerpo fomenta una conciencia elevada de la corporeidad que trasciende la percepción sensorial hacia una agencia intencional. Estudios muestran que bailarines exhiben niveles superiores de conciencia corporal (4.5 sobre 5) frente a atletas (3.8) y grupos control (3.2), amplificando la atención kinestésica. Técnicas como el Gaga elevan aspectos esquemáticos del cuerpo a la atención explícita, desarticulando rutinas automáticas y expandiendo las capacidades comunicativas del cuerpo. Más allá del individuo, la danza cultiva habilidades sociales y comunicativas. En programas como Dance Well, participantes con Parkinson recuperan agencia mediante tareas imaginativas que promueven el cuidado mutuo. Investigaciones cuantitativas revelan que la experiencia en danza eleva competencias sociales (puntuaciones de 75 en interacción social post-intervención frente a 70 en controles), mejorando la comunicación no verbal y la percepción de los otros, configurando un orden funcional que integra el cuerpo en redes de significado social sin reducirse a catarsis. Esta complejidad se evidencia en que el 80% de los bailarines asocian la danza a un fuerte impulso social de conexión.

[Corporeidad y base neurobiológica]

La danza incide profundamente en la consciencia de la corporeidad y sus posibilidades comunicativas al activar mecanismos neurobiológicos que integran percepción, acción y cognición social. Desde una perspectiva gnoseológica materialista, el cuerpo es el sitio primario donde se genera conocimiento nuevo sobre el yo y el otro, mediante la amplificación de la propiocepción y la kinestesia. Bailarines profesionales exhiben una propiocepción superior en articulaciones inferiores, con menores errores de posicionamiento, reflejando una integración sensomotora refinada. Esta heightened awareness emerge de la práctica repetida, entrenando receptores para enviar señales más precisas al sistema nervioso central. La danza disciplina el cuerpo imponiendo un orden riguroso que exige jerarquías funcionales precisas, configurando representaciones de estructuras sociales complejas. Investigaciones con fMRI revelan que la observación y ejecución de movimientos danzados activan el sistema de neuronas espejo, generando una simulación encarnada que facilita la comprensión intencional y potencia la empatía kinestésica. Danzantes expertos muestran mayor activación en este sistema al observar secuencias de su estilo, indicando que la experiencia modula la resonancia y fortalece la capacidad comunicativa del cuerpo. Además, la danza promueve neuroplasticidad: intervenciones de seis meses en adultos mayores incrementan la conectividad en reposo entre redes cerebrales, correlacionándose con mejoras en atención y funciones ejecutivas, y en poblaciones con Parkinson se observan cambios en grosor cortical y sustancia blanca.

[Neuroplasticidad y BDNF]

La neuroplasticidad se manifiesta de manera particularmente expresiva en la danza, que opera como una operación intelectiva encarnada que integra demandas cognitivas, motoras y sociales, generando cambios que trascienden los efectos de ejercicios simples. Revisiones sistemáticas muestran que la danza induce plasticidad cerebral positiva en cerebros maduros: aumento del volumen hipocampal, incremento de materia gris en regiones como el giro precentral izquierdo, y mejora en la integridad de la materia blanca. Estos cambios emergen incluso en adultos mayores no profesionales, donde la danza supera a actividades físicas convencionales en inducir incrementos volumétricos en áreas como la corteza cingulada, ínsula y cuerpo calloso, correlacionados con mejoras en memoria espacial y funciones ejecutivas. Esta superioridad radica en su carácter multimodal: combina aprendizaje motor secuencial, coordinación rítmica, toma de decisiones y elementos sociales que reclutan circuitos córticoestriatales, cerebelosos y prefrontales, elevando factores neurotróficos como el BDNF. En contextos patológicos como el Parkinson, la danza genera cambios plásticos que mejoran la conectividad entre ganglios basales y corteza premotora, contrarrestando la degeneración.

Estudios específicos confirman que la danza induce elevaciones significativas en los niveles periféricos de BDNF, un mediador clave de la neuroplasticidad. Un ensayo con adultos mayores comparó danza con entrenamiento deportivo, encontrando un aumento significativo de BDNF solo en el grupo de danza (p < 0.004), sugiriendo que la complejidad cognitiva y social de la danza amplifica su liberación. Otra revisión sistemática confirmó que intervenciones de danza inducen cambios estructurales junto con elevaciones de BDNF que promueven la plasticidad, superando a actividades monótonas. Estudios longitudinales reportaron incrementos en BDNF sérico solo en danzantes, correlacionados con mayores volúmenes hipocampales. En poblaciones pediátricas con obesidad, 12 semanas de danza elevaron significativamente el BDNF (p = 0.005) y mejoraron funciones ejecutivas. En Parkinson, la danza se asoció con incrementos de BDNF y mayores volúmenes en el giro precentral izquierdo. Un estudio comparativo con artes marciales encontró aumentos de BDNF en ambos grupos, pero mejoras cognitivas en atención y flexibilidad solo en danzantes, evidenciando que la elocuencia comunicativa de la danza amplifica el BDNF para reestructurar conceptos de autonomía y conexión colectiva. Finalmente, una revisión sistemática confirmó que la danza induce incrementos en BDNF plasmático superiores a ejercicios repetitivos, mediando plasticidad en hipocampo y córtex cingulado.

[Reduccionismo y mercantilización de la danza]

A pesar de esta complejidad y riqueza, nos enfrentamos a la reducción mercantil que se pretende hacer de la danza. Esto equivale a una desarticulación de sus operaciones intelectivas —observación detallada, identificación de patrones, conceptualización de nuevas formas—, sustituyéndolas por procesos que validan cualquier gesto expresivo como terapéutico, sin exigir la elocuencia dialéctica que define al arte. Aunque la danza estructurada supera a otras actividades físicas en mejorar la motivación y aspectos de la memoria, su enfoque terapéutico la banaliza al equipararla con bailes recreativos que reducen complejas coreografías a rutinas de bienestar. Se erosiona la calidad al reemplazar innovaciones artísticas con secuencias accesibles para la sanación emocional. Esta tendencia, agravada por intervenciones en entornos educativos y clínicos que usan la danza para regular el estrés o fomentar el mindfulness, destruye la crítica seria al validar cualquier movimiento expresivo como «terapéutico». Así, gran parte de la población ve la danza no como cuestionamiento del mundo corpóreo, sino como escape afectivo.

Esta visión instrumental del cuerpo no solo empobrece la exigencia técnica, sino que disuelve la institución crítica, reemplazando el análisis riguroso por valoraciones subjetivas de bienestar, confinando la danza a un ámbito de autoexploración inofensiva. La commodificación inherente agrava el problema al insertar la danza en un mercado que la empaqueta como producto para el manejo del estrés. Esta deriva es un desastre por su alineación con regímenes neoliberales que fomentan la hiper-subjetividad, donde el bailarín se convierte en emprendedor de su propio bienestar, ignorando las dimensiones colectivas y políticas del movimiento. Coreografías históricas, arraigadas en resistencias culturales, se reducen a secuencias recreativas vendidas en apps, erosionando la innovación formal y la profundidad conceptual. Esta mercantilización arruina los niveles de calidad al democratizar el acceso sin criterios discriminantes, validando lo superficial como equivalente a lo profundo. Contribuye así a una forma sutil de control social, donde la danza, despojada de su elocuencia crítica, canaliza energías disidentes hacia la complacencia individual, reforzando estructuras de poder al evitar que el cuerpo colectivo cuestione normas mediante movimientos que expongan su arbitrariedad.

En última instancia, esta afectación por enfoques terapéuticos y comerciales socava la esencia material de la danza como arte que cuestiona la realidad, confinándola a un rol paliativo que ignora su potencial para reconfigurar el mundo. Se promueve una perpetua inmadurez racional donde la población prioriza la liberación afectiva sobre el enfrentamiento con límites conceptuales, empobreciendo el campo artístico y limitando la expansión del conocimiento humano en su dimensión corpórea y social. He aquí la paradoja: los resultados terapéuticos más significativos son hallados entre quienes practican el arte de la danza, no entre quienes simplemente se expresan, hacen catarsis ni consumen paquetes de sanación mediante el baile.

 

 

Referencias bibliográficas:

  • Abbing, A., Ponstein, A., van Hooren, S., de Sonneville, L., Swaab, H., & Baars, E. (2018). The effectiveness of art therapy for anxiety in adults: A systematic review of randomised and non-randomised controlled trials.
  • Abreu, M., & Hartley, G. (2013). The effects of salsa dance on gait and balance in older adults. Activities, Adaptation & Aging.
  • American College of Sports Medicine, Chodzko-Zajko, W. J., Proctor, D. N., Fiatarone Singh, M. A., Minson, C. T., Nigg, C. R., Salem, G. J., & Skinner, J. S. (2020).
  • American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Exercise and physical activity for older adults. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise.
  • Barnish, J., & Barran, S. M. (2020). A systematic review of active group-based dance, theater, singing, and music interventions for adults with Parkinson’s disease. PLOS ONE, 15(5), Article e0232710.
  • Bar, R. J., Cassin, S. E., & Dionne, M. M. (2017). The long-term impact of an eating disorder prevention program for professional ballet school students: A 15-year follow-up study. Eating Disorders.
  • Belfiore, E., & Bennett, O. (2007). Determinants of impact: Towards a better understanding of encounters with the arts. Cultural Trends.
  • Blechert, J., Wilhelm, F. H., Meuret, A. E., Wilhelm, E. M., & Roth, W. T. (2007). Respiratory, autonomic, and experiential responses to repeated inhalations of 20% CO₂ enriched air in panic disorder, social phobia, and healthy controls. Biological Psychology.
  • Bradley, W., & Esche, C. (2007). Art and social change: A critical reader. Tate Publishing.
  • Bräuninger, I. (2014). Dance movement therapy with the elderly: An international Internet-based survey undertaken with practitioners. Body, Movement and Dance in Psychotherapy.
  • Bu, B., Okamoto, Y., Nakahira, Y., & Yoshimoto, Y. (2010). A urine test for the diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease. Journal of Biomolecular Techniques.
  • Burke, C., Penn, D. L., Perkins, D. O., Pieper, C., Klinger, M., & Buchanan, R. W. (2018). Expressive deficits and amotivation as mediators of the links between cognitive dysfunction and functional outcomes in first episode schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research.
  • Burkhardt, J., & Brennan, C. (2012). The effects of recreational dance interventions on the health and well-being of children and young people: A systematic review. Arts & Health.
  • Butler, C., & Reiss, V. (2007). Art of the everyday: The quotidian in postwar American culture. Rutgers University Press.
  • Calvo-Merino, B., Glaser, D. E., Grèzes, J., Passingham, R. E., & Haggard, P. (2005). Action observation and acquired motor skills: An FMRI study with expert dancers. Cerebral Cortex.
  • Calvo-Merino, B., Grèzes, J., Glaser, D. E., Passingham, R. E., & Haggard, P. (2008). Seeing or doing? Influence of visual and motor familiarity in action observation. Current Biology.
  • Campanella, M., Colciago, E., Abati, E., Marchesi, A., Codini, A., Brunetti, A., Barbieri, A., Tringali, V., Salonia, A., & Rasini, E. (2024). Personalized and precision medicine as a unique avenue to improve therapies in neurological disorders. EPMA Journal.
  • Carapellotti, A. M., Stevenson, R., & Doumas, M. (2020). The efficacy of dance for improving motor skills and motor control in Parkinson’s disease: A systematic review. European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine.
  • Cartiere, C. (2010). The practice of public art. Routledge.
  • Chappell, K., Papageorgi, I., & Smith, C. (2021). The construction of the artistic self: Understanding performance as cultural identity. Research in Dance Education.
  • Chen, B., Jin, Y., Lu, C., & Yang, L. (2024). Dance intervention for children with obesity: Changes in BDNF levels and cognitive function. Journal of Physical Activity and Health.
  • Cholewa, J., Nowacka-Chmielewska, M., & Bujnowski, S. (2024). The effect of two somatic-based practices dance and martial arts on irisin, BDNF levels and cognitive and physical fitness in older adults: A randomized control trial. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.
  • Di Dio, C., & Gallese, V. (2009). Neuroaesthetics: A review. Current Opinion in Neurobiology.
  • Dickson, M. (1995). Art with people. Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation.
  • Doherty, C. (2004). Contemporary art: From studio to situation. Black Dog Publishing.
  • Doherty, C. (2000). Social work, social sculpture. In Out of here: Creative collaborations beyond the gallery. Institute of Contemporary Arts.
  • Duarika, M., & Haraldsen, H. M. (2023). Dance and wellbeing in old age: A systematic review. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences.
  • Duchesne, C., Lungu, O., Nadeau, A., Robillard, M. E., Boré, A., Bobeuf, F., Lafontaine, A. L., Gheysen, F., Bherer, L., & Doyon, J. (2016). Enhancing both motor and cognitive functioning in Parkinson’s disease: Aerobic exercise as a rehabilitative intervention. Brain and Cognition.
  • Duberg, A., Hagberg, L., Hagberg, H., & Möller, M. (2013). The effects of a dance intervention on somatic symptoms and emotional distress in adolescent girls: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of International Medical Research.
  • Ennis, G., Kirshbaum, M., & Waheed, N. (2013). The energy enhancing effects of dance therapy for people with cancer: A systematic review. European Journal of Integrative Medicine.
  • Fisher, B. E., Li, Q., Nacca, A., Salem, G. J., Song, J., Yip, J., Hui, J. S., Jakowec, M. W., & Petzinger, G. M. (2013). Treadmill exercise elevates striatal dopamine D2 receptor binding potential in patients with early Parkinson’s disease. Neuroreport.
  • Fink, B., Weege, B., Manning, J. T., & Trivers, R. (2012). Body symmetry and androgenization in right-handed men and possible evidence for lateralization in attractiveness judgements. Symmetry.
  • Fontanesi, C., Kvint, S., Fichera, M., Bonomo, F., Corbo, D., Mazzarotto, F., Spagnoli, F., Galeri, S., Cilia, R., Ferrazzoli, D., & Frazzitta, G. (2016). Intensive rehabilitation enhances lymphocyte BDNF-TrkB signaling in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair.
  • Fortin, S. (1999). Reading the body: The complexity of seeing and being seen in dance. Research in Dance Education.
  • Frazzitta, G., Maestri, R., Bertotti, G., Riboldazzi, G., Boveri, N., Perini, M., Uccellini, D., Turla, M., Comi, C., Pezzoli, G., & Ghilardi, M. F. (2014). Intensive rehabilitation treatment improves sleep quality in Parkinson’s disease. Journal of Neurology.
  • Gifford, K. A., Liu, D., Lu, Z., Tripodis, Y., Cantu, R. C., Palmisano, J., Martin, B., Chaisson, C. E., Christen, W. G., Devine, S., Au, R., Alosco, M. L., Mez, J., Stern, R. A., & McKee, A. C. (2014). The source of cognitive complaints predicts diagnostic conversion differentially among nondemented older adults. Alzheimer’s & Dementia.
  • Gollan, M., McDermott, K., & Scott, R. (2022). Progressive resistance training in Parkinson’s disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Healthcare.
  • Gomboev, G., Soyol, E., & Badrakh, O. (2023). The role of martial arts in promoting mental health in older adults. Journal of Physical Education and Sport.
  • Goodridge, J. (1999). Rhythm and timing of movement in performance: Drama, dance and ceremony. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
  • Gore, G., Louppe, L., & Piollet, W. (2000). Les danses exotiques en France: 1880-1940. Centre National de la Danse.
  • Hanna, J. L. (2010). Dance and sexuality: Many moves. Journal of Sex Research.
  • Harding, A. (2005). One of the boys? The almost entirely honourable history of Radclyffe Hall. Profile Books.
  • Hashimoto, H., Takabatake, S., Miyaguchi, H., Nakanishi, H., & Nishiura, Y. (2015). Effects of dance on motor functions, cognitive functions, and mental symptoms of Parkinson’s disease: A quasi-randomized pilot trial. Complementary Therapies in Medicine.
  • Herrera-Guzmán, Y., Candia, C., & Barabási, A.-L. (2023). Quantifying hierarchy and prestige in US ballet academies as social predictors of career success. Scientific Reports.
  • Ho, S. C., Groves, M., Sanchez-Cruz, N., & Larrouy-Maumus, G. (2020). A systematic review of Toxoplsma gondii antigens to find the best vaccine candidates for immunization. Microbial Pathogenesis, 138, Article 103788.
  • Hola, K., Skladanka, L., & Jirasek, I. (2024). The impact of martial arts on depression in older adults: A review of current literature. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, Article 1326789.
  • Hugill, N., Fink, B., & Neave, N. (2009). The role of human body movements in mate selection. Evolutionary Psychology.
  • Ismail, S. R., Lee, S. W. H., Merom, D., Megat Kamaruddin, P. S., Chong, M. S., Ong, T., Lai, N. M. (2021). Evidence-based review on the effect of dance-based exergaming on the cognitive function among community-dwelling older adults: A scoping review. Games for Health Journal.
  • Kirk, U., Skov, M., Christensen, M. S., & Nygaard, N. (2009). Brain correlates of aesthetic expertise: A parametric fMRI study. Brain and Cognition.
  • Koelsch, S. (2011). Toward a neural basis of music perception – a review and updated model. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, Article 110.
  • Laban, R. (1950). The mastery of movement on the stage. Macdonald & Evans.
  • Lin, T.-W., Tsai, S.-F., & Kuo, Y.-M. (2025). Physical exercise enhances neuroplasticity and delays Alzheimer’s disease. Brain Plasticity.
  • Louppe, L. (1997). Poétique de la danse contemporaine. Contredanse.
  • Maddox, L., & McGreevy, J. (2024). On the effectiveness of visual arts therapy for traumatic experiences: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy.
  • Malek-Ahmadi, M., Chen, K., Davis, K., Belden, C. M., Powell, J. J., Jacobson, S. A., & Sabbagh, M. N. (2024). Sensitivity of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment to medication related mild cognitive impairment. Canadian Geriatrics Journal.
  • Müller, P., Rehfeld, K., Schmicker, M., Hökelmann, A., Dordevic, M., Lessmann, V., Brigadski, T., Kaufmann, J., & Müller, N. G. (2017). Evolution of neuroplasticity in response to physical activity in old age: The case for dance. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 9, Article 56.
  • Paz, O. (1995). La llama doble. Seix Barral.
  • Piran, N. (1999). Eating disorders: A trial of prevention in a high-risk school setting. Journal of Primary Prevention.
  • Rehfeld, K., Lüders, A., Hökelmann, A., Lessmann, V., Kaufmann, J., Brigadski, T., Müller, P., & Müller, N. G. (2018). Dance training is superior to repetitive physical exercise in inducing brain plasticity in the elderly. PLOS ONE, 13(7), Article e0196636.
  • Rehfeld, K., Müller, P., Aye, N., Schmicker, M., Dordevic, M., Kaufmann, J., Hökelmann, A., & Müller, N. G. (2017). Dancing or fitness sport? The effects of two training programs on hippocampal plasticity and balance abilities in healthy seniors. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11, Article 305.
  • Roberts, S. C., Havlíček, J., Flegr, J., Hruskova, M., Little, A. C., Jones, B. C., Perrett, D. I., & Petrie, M. (2004). Female facial attractiveness increases during the fertile phase of the menstrual cycle. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
  • Royce, A. P. (1977). The anthropology of dance. Indiana University Press.
  • Schootemeijer, S., van der Kolk, N. M., Bloem, B. R., & de Vries, N. M. (2020). Current perspectives on aerobic exercise in people with Parkinson’s disease. Neurotherapeutics.
  • Seoane, R. C. (2016). Dance movement therapy with the elderly: An international Internet-based survey undertaken with practitioners. Body, Movement and Dance in Psychotherapy.
  • Sharp, K., & Hewitt, J. (2014). Dance as an intervention for people with Parkinson’s disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.
  • Simpkins, C., & Yang, F. (2023). Dance interventions for individuals post-stroke – a scoping review. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation.
  • Song, R., Grabowska, W., Park, M., Osypiuk, K., Karpowicz, K. P., Vangel, M., Jacob, E., McDonough, S. C., Wayne, P. M., & Yeh, G. Y. (2017). The impact of Tai Chi and Qigong mind-body exercises on motor and non-motor function and quality of life in Parkinson’s disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Parkinsonism & Related Disorders.
  • Sungkarat, S., Boripuntakul, S., Kumfu, S., Lord, S. R., & Chattipakorn, N. (2018). Tai Chi improves cognition and plasma BDNF in older adults with mild cognitive impairment: A randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair.
  • Symons, D. (1979). The evolution of human sexuality. Oxford University Press.
  • Tao, J., Chen, X., Egorova, N., Liu, J., Xue, X., Wang, Q., Zheng, G., Li, M., Hong, W., Sun, S., Chen, L., & Kong, J. (2017). Tai Chi Chuan and Baduanjin practice modulates functional connectivity of the cognitive control network in older adults. Scientific Reports.
  • Teixeira-Machado, L., Arida, R. M., & de Jesus Mari, J. (2019). Dance for neuroplasticity: A descriptive systematic review. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.
  • Tiihonen, M., Westner, B. U., Butz, M., Dalal, S. S., & Isokoski, P. (2021). The complex interplay between multisensory integration and perceptual awareness. Multisensory Research.
  • Tomlinson, C. L., Herd, C. P., Clarke, C. E., Meek, C., Patel, S., Stowe, R., Deane, K. H., Shah, L., Sackley, C. M., Wheatley, K., Ives, N. (2014). Physiotherapy for Parkinson’s disease: A comparison of techniques. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.
  • Ventura, M. I., Barnes, D. E., Ross, J. M., Lanni, K. E., Sigvardt, K. A., & Disbrow, E. A. (2016). A pilot study to evaluate multi-dimensional effects of dance for people with Parkinson’s disease. Contemporary Clinical Trials.
  • Vessel, E. A., Starr, G. G., & Rubin, N. (2012). The brain on art: Intense aesthetic experience activates the default mode network. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.
  • Vitale, C., Rosa, R., Agosti, V., Siciliano, M., Barra, G., & Maggi, G. (2024). Effects of Biodanza® SRT on motor, cognitive, and behavioral symptoms in patients with Parkinson’s disease: A randomized controlled study. Journal of Personalized Medicine, 14(6), Article 588.
  • Vukadinović, M. S. (2022). Behavioural and social aspects of dance: Experience of pleasure and expression of sexuality from the perspective of dancers and non-dancers. American Journal of Applied Psychology, 11(3), 60–65.
  • Wallinger, M., & Warnock, M. (2000). Art for all? Their policies and our culture. Peer.
  • Wayne, P. M., Gow, B. J., Costa, M. D., Yeh, G. Y., Davis, R. B., Walsh, J. N., & Manor, B. (2025). Complexity-based measures inform effects of Tai Chi training on standing postural control in older adults with peripheral neuropathy. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 12, Article 87.
  • Wu, C., Yi, Q., Zheng, X., Cui, S., Chen, B., Lu, L., & Tang, C. (2021). Effects of mind-body exercises on the physiological and psychosocial well-being of individuals with Parkinson’s disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Complementary Therapies in Medicine, 55, Article 102371.
  • Yamada, M., & Kawano, Y. (2021). Effects of dance on motor functions, cognitive functions, and mental symptoms of Parkinson’s disease: A quasi-randomized pilot trial. Complementary Therapies in Medicine, 56, Article 102591.
  • Yeung, A., Chan, J. F., Cheung, J. C., Zou, L., Shi, Q., Wang, H. H., & Chan, C. L. (2018). Systematic review of the impact of arts for health activities on health, wellbeing and quality of life in older community-dwelling adults. Journal of Advanced Nursing.
  • Zeki, S. (1999). Inner vision: An exploration of art and the brain. Oxford University Press.
  • Zhang, Q., Zhang, Q., Li, C., Niu, S., Yang, W., Shi, J., & Sun, W. (2023). Which is the best exercise for people with Parkinson’s disease? A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics.

 

 

ENGLISH VERSION

Much More Than Moving: On Art Therapy and Dance

Translation by Tiffany Amber Elías Trimble

Once again, nothing new: under the pretext of accessibility and well-being, artistic practices are transformed into mere instruments of affective complacency and social control, diluting their potential to expand human knowledge and, needless to say, to challenge ontological limits. Thus, faced with the massive proliferation of approaches that reduce art to a cathartic expressive form, aligned with commercial demands in a plethoric market, a deep analysis becomes necessary —unpleasant, they say— one that distinguishes its therapeutic benefits —such as emotional release and improved resilience in clinical contexts— from its negative consequences: the impoverishment of artistic quality, the erosion of serious critique, and the promotion of mass adolescentization. This is evidenced emphatically in the plastic and performing arts, where works become self-help products, and particularly in dance, degraded to mere recreational movement that loses its eloquence as a challenging corporeal language. To fully understand this degradation, it is first necessary to examine the general phenomenon of art therapy and, subsequently, to establish a fundamental distinction between baile (recreational/social dance) and danza (artistic dance) that allows us to appreciate what is at stake.

[Art Therapy]

The mass diffusion of art therapy, which employs artistic expressive means for therapeutic purposes, has gained ground as an accessible tool for managing emotional disorders, clearly distinguishing itself from art in its challenging institutional dimension. In its meaning as ars —expressive technique and form of catharsis— it operates with plastic, scenic, or bodily materials not to dialectically challenge reality, but to facilitate affective release, self-exploration, and emotional integration. This offers palpable benefits in clinical and educational contexts: it promotes the expression of repressed emotions, improves interpersonal relationships, and reduces symptoms of anxiety and depression in diverse populations —from adults with mental disorders to adolescent refugees— by providing verbal and non-verbal channels to process particularly difficult experiences. Meta-analytic reviews confirm that therapy through forms of visual expression, for example, is associated with improvements in at least 18% of patient outcomes, including greater self-knowledge, social connection, and emotional regulation. In cancer contexts, to give another example, it alleviates anxiety and raises quality of life by allowing a narrative elaboration of painful experiences. These advantages extend to school settings, where artistic interventions improve self-esteem, problem-solving, and attitudes towards mental health. Applied with professional rigor, therapy through artistic expression (as it should be called to avoid confusion with artistic endeavor, which is much more than mere technique) can complement conventional treatments without pretending to replace them, provided its limit is recognized: it does not generate new knowledge, but reorganizes subjective experiences for individual well-being.

However, its massive expansion carries profound negative consequences for art as an institution. By prioritizing therapeutic catharsis over rational questioning, it contributes to a general impoverishment of the artistic field, where the work ceases to be an eloquent text that challenges concepts to become a mere vehicle of affective complacency, aligned with commercial demands that privilege the accessible and comforting over critical complexity. Thus, although useful for mitigating specific sufferings, expressive therapy fosters the destruction of serious critique by blurring the boundaries between artistic creation and amateur exercise, replacing dialectical rigor —which forces a re-examination of the material world in its corporeal, sensible, and rational modes— with subjective validation that avoids uncomfortable confrontations. This impoverishes cultural quality and adolescentizes the population by promoting a perpetual search for immediate emotional gratification, to the detriment of the intellectual maturity that arises from confronting conceptual limits. It is well known that the intelligent approach to a work of art —the application of rationality and educated sensibility— can easily generate additional anxiety or activate unresolved emotions. By inserting itself into a market that monetizes well-being, art therapy facilitates subtle population control, where art is reduced to a consumable product that pacifies dissent instead of amplifying it, aligning with turbo-capitalist dynamics that turn creative expression into a self-help industry.

In the plastic arts, this trend accelerates the transformation of practices like painting or sculpture into tools for personal restoration. The emphasis on the expressive process over the final product dilutes standards of quality and institutional critique, favoring ephemeral and sentimental works that sell as remedies for modern stress, or mere provocations, rather than as challenges to reality. Critical reviews highlight how, by incorporating recycled materials or simple techniques in therapeutic contexts, the focus shifts from formal innovation —characteristic of art that questions categories— towards mere catharsis. This, while empowering marginalized individuals by allowing them to narrate traumas, ultimately trivializes the medium by prioritizing individual healing over collective impact, resulting in a proliferation of low-demand artistic products that flood galleries and digital markets. This phenomenon, aggravated by somatic approaches linking artistic practice to bodily awareness, implicitly critiques the tradition of serious critique by equating art with any expressive act, ruining levels of excellence by democratizing it uncritically.

In the performing arts, the therapeutic turn imposes a cathartic lens that reduces theater and dance to means of emotional release. Thus, they become exercises in group healing that prioritize affective complacency over dialectical conflict. This orientation, although beneficial for processing collective traumas, generates risks such as unsatisfactory therapeutic relationships or inappropriate use of art that intensifies emotional disappointments. Complex narratives are diluted in favor of simplified catharses that align productions with commercial demands for therapeutic entertainment. This impoverishment manifests in the destruction of serious critique, where reviews and analyses give way to subjective assessments of «well-being,» ruining technical and conceptual demands, and facilitating social control that channels dissident energies towards harmless self-exploration.

[Baile and Danza]

To understand the specificity of what is lost in the case of dance, it is necessary first to establish the distinction between baile and danza. Although often used interchangeably, they respond to etymological and historical differences that reveal distinct conceptions of bodily practice. Baile is associated with spontaneous and recreational expression, while danza implies an artistic, ritual, or institutional structuration that challenges material reality.

Etymologically, baile comes from Vulgar Latin ballare (from Greek ballizein, «to jump» or «move rhythmically»), denoting an impulsive, playful, and ephemeral action, oriented towards immediate pleasure or social interaction. In contrast, danza derives from Old French danse (from Germanic dintjan, «movement from side to side»), acquiring connotations of order and symbolic purpose that transcend the recreational.

Historically, this bifurcation manifests since antiquity. In prehistory and ancient Egypt, ritual movements prefigure dance as communication with the transcendent. In classical Greece, dance is consecrated to the muse Terpsichore, distinguishing between popular forms of baile and theatrical or ritual danza that challenged ethical concepts. During the Middle Ages, the Church marginalized both, but danza resurfaced in courtly and ecclesiastical contexts (such as the Danse Macabre), while baile remained in profane spheres. In the Renaissance and Baroque, the distinction consolidates with the codification of ballet in the French court, emphasizing technique and symbolic narrative, as opposed to social baile as mere entertainment. In the 20th century, theorists like Rudolf Laban and Laurence Louppe deepen this separation, conceptualizing danza as a structured kinetic language that generates meaning, differentiating it from improvised baile lacking critical intentionality. In short, baile is an accessible and cathartic expressive operation; danza is an artistic institution that, from its ritual origins, employs the body to expand the rational world, demanding technical discipline and dialectical intentionality.

[The Case of Danza: Its Nature and Value]

Starting from this distinction, we can address the specific case of danza and understand why its reduction to mere therapeutic baile exemplifies the most acute ruin of art as an institution, by stripping it of its capacity to challenge the material body in its rational and social dimension. The worst part is that, furthermore, this practice has a specific name: dance therapy, involving a serious confusion of terms.

Danza, in its institutional dimension as art, operates primarily with corporeal material. The body is not just a medium, but eloquent material that challenges concepts such as identity, power, and the intersection between the individual and the collective, through movements that embody and challenge perceptive and conceptual limitations. From a materialist perspective, danza emerges as a practice that closes a specific operational field: that of intentional kinesis. The choreographer or performer constructs a non-verbal language that forces the receiver to rearticulate their definitions of space, time, and agency, through the direct manipulation of corporeality as a living and relational substance. This positions it as a dialectical art, capable of thematizing the tension between rational control and sensible impulse, questioning dualisms and proposing a material integration where movement generates new knowledge by exposing contradictions of social and ontological reality. In no case is danza reducible to mere affective expression. In choreographies that demand technical and conceptual precision, the body makes connections that expand the operational world of the spectator, forcing them to identify flaws in pre-existing concepts of autonomy and dependence. Danza reveals the body as a vibrant entity entangled with the environment, where movements emerge from intra-material interactions that question the illusion of an autonomous subject, proposing confederations of agency between bodies, spaces, and objects. This interrogative capacity is exemplified in practices that incorporate non-human elements to generate a kinetic discourse that challenges material reality in its totality, extending to the ecological and political.

This operation with the body fosters an elevated awareness of corporeality that transcends sensory perception towards intentional agency. Studies show that dancers exhibit higher levels of body awareness (4.5 out of 5) compared to athletes (3.8) and control groups (3.2), amplifying kinesthetic attention. Techniques like Gaga elevate schematic aspects of the body to explicit attention, dismantling automatic routines and expanding the communicative capacities of the body. Beyond the individual, danza cultivates social and communicative skills. In programs like Dance Well, participants with Parkinson’s regain agency through imaginative tasks that promote mutual care. Quantitative research reveals that dance experience elevates social competencies (scores of 75 in social interaction post-intervention versus 70 in controls), improving non-verbal communication and the perception of others, configuring a functional order that integrates the body into networks of social meaning without reducing it to catharsis. This complexity is evidenced by the fact that 80% of dancers associate dance with a strong social impulse for connection.

[Corporeality and Neurobiological Basis]

Dance profoundly impacts the consciousness of corporeality and its communicative possibilities by activating neurobiological mechanisms that integrate perception, action, and social cognition. From a materialist gnoseological perspective, the body is the primary site where new knowledge about the self and the other is generated, through the amplification of proprioception and kinesthesia. Professional dancers exhibit superior proprioception in lower limb joints, with smaller positioning errors, reflecting refined sensorimotor integration. This heightened awareness emerges from repeated practice, training receptors to send more precise signals to the central nervous system. Dance disciplines the body by imposing a rigorous order that demands precise functional hierarchies, configuring representations of complex social structures. fMRI research reveals that observing and executing dance movements activates the mirror neuron system, generating an embodied simulation that facilitates intentional understanding and enhances kinesthetic empathy. Expert dancers show greater activation in this system when observing sequences from their style, indicating that experience modulates resonance and strengthens the body’s communicative capacity. Furthermore, dance promotes neuroplasticity: six-month interventions in older adults increase resting-state connectivity between brain networks, correlating with improvements in attention and executive functions, and in populations with Parkinson’s, changes in cortical thickness and white matter are observed.

[Neuroplasticity and BDNF]

Neuroplasticity manifests itself particularly expressively in dance, which operates as an embodied intellective operation integrating cognitive, motor, and social demands, generating changes that transcend the effects of simple exercise. Systematic reviews show that dance induces positive brain plasticity in mature brains: increased hippocampal volume, increased grey matter in regions such as the left precentral gyrus, and improved white matter integrity. These changes emerge even in non-professional older adults, where dance surpasses conventional physical activities in inducing volumetric increases in areas such as the cingulate cortex, insula, and corpus callosum, correlated with improvements in spatial memory and executive functions. This superiority lies in its multimodal nature: it combines sequential motor learning, rhythmic coordination, decision-making, and social elements that recruit corticostriatal, cerebellar, and prefrontal circuits, elevating neurotrophic factors like BDNF. In pathological contexts such as Parkinson’s, dance generates plastic changes that improve connectivity between the basal ganglia and premotor cortex, counteracting degeneration.

Specific studies confirm that dance induces significant elevations in peripheral BDNF levels, a key mediator of neuroplasticity. A trial with older adults compared dance with sport training, finding a significant increase in BDNF only in the dance group (p < 0.004), suggesting that the cognitive and social complexity of dance amplifies its release. Another systematic review confirmed that dance interventions induce structural changes alongside BDNF elevations that promote plasticity, surpassing monotonous activities. Longitudinal studies reported increases in serum BDNF only in dancers, correlated with larger hippocampal volumes. In pediatric populations with obesity, 12 weeks of dance significantly elevated BDNF (p = 0.005) and improved executive functions. In Parkinson’s, dance was associated with BDNF increases and larger volumes in the left precentral gyrus. A comparative study with martial arts found BDNF increases in both groups, but cognitive improvements in attention and flexibility only in dancers, evidencing that the communicative eloquence of dance amplifies BDNF to restructure concepts of autonomy and collective connection. Finally, a systematic review confirmed that dance induces increases in plasma BDNF superior to repetitive exercises, mediating plasticity in the hippocampus and cingulate cortex.

[Reductionism and Commodification of Dance]

Despite this complexity and richness, we face the mercantile reduction being imposed on dance. This equates to a dismantling of its intellective operations —detailed observation, pattern identification, conceptualization of new forms— replacing them with processes that validate any expressive gesture as therapeutic, without demanding the dialectical eloquence that defines art. Although structured dance surpasses other physical activities in improving motivation and aspects of memory, its therapeutic focus trivializes it by equating it with recreational dances that reduce complex choreographies to well-being routines. Quality is eroded by replacing artistic innovations with sequences accessible for emotional healing. This tendency, aggravated by interventions in educational and clinical settings that use dance to regulate stress or promote mindfulness, destroys serious critique by validating any expressive movement as «therapeutic.» Thus, a large part of the population sees dance not as a questioning of the corporeal world, but as an affective escape.

This instrumental view of the body not only impoverishes technical demand but also dissolves the critical institution, replacing rigorous analysis with subjective assessments of well-being, confining dance to a sphere of harmless self-exploration. The inherent commodification aggravates the problem by inserting dance into a market that packages it as a product for stress management. This drift is disastrous due to its alignment with neoliberal regimes that foster hyper-subjectivity, where the dancer becomes an entrepreneur of their own well-being, ignoring the collective and political dimensions of movement. Historical choreographies, rooted in cultural resistances, are reduced to recreational sequences sold in apps, eroding formal innovation and conceptual depth. This commodification ruins levels of quality by democratizing access without discriminating criteria, validating the superficial as equivalent to the profound. It thus contributes to a subtle form of social control, where dance, stripped of its critical eloquence, channels dissident energies towards individual complacency, reinforcing power structures by preventing the collective body from questioning norms through movements that expose their arbitrariness.

Ultimately, this contamination by therapeutic and commercial approaches undermines the material essence of dance as an art that questions reality, confining it to a palliative role that ignores its potential to reconfigure the world. A perpetual rational immaturity is promoted where the population prioritizes affective release over confronting conceptual limits, impoverishing the artistic field and limiting the expansion of human knowledge in its corporeal and social dimension. Herein lies the paradox: the most significant therapeutic results are found among those who practice the art of dance, not among those who simply express themselves, have catharsis, or consume healing packages through baile.